A Blog About Intellectual Property Litigation and the District of Delaware


Entries for tag: 12(c) Motion

It was not long ago that we at the blog noted Judge Andrews' declaration that "it doesn't require much to plead a claim for direct patent infringement."

Today's case gives us an example of a filing that failed to clear that bar in a rather interesting way.

A propos of nothing, I just remembered that I made a joke years ago about just making this the image for all of my posts.  We'll see how long I last.
AI-Generated, displayed with permission

The plaintiff in Tir Techs. Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Comms., LLC, C.A. No. 25-885-JCG, D.I. 48 (D. Del. Mar. 11, 2026), attached actual claim charts to their complaint. This is normally a positive for surviving a 12(b)(6).

The defendants, however, moved to dismiss because the claim charts actually charted infringement by third party Amazon Web Services. The charts and and complaint would then "include frequent variations …

On September 3, 2020, Judge Connolly invalidated five asserted patents as patent ineligible on a single Rule 12 motion. In Sensormatic Electronics, LLC v. Wyze Labs, Inc., C.A. No. 19-1543-CFC, Judge Connolly granted defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, invalidating five of seven asserted patents (two of the seven were no longer being asserted).