As is tradition, IP/DE will be going quiet for a couple of weeks over the Fourth of July holiday, as both Nate and I are taking trips. Have a good 4th, and see you next month!
As is tradition, IP/DE will be going quiet for a couple of weeks over the Fourth of July holiday, as both Nate and I are taking trips. Have a good 4th, and see you next month!
I heard from a reader today that the daily e-mail had stopped coming through last week.
I looked into it, and sure enough, it hasn't been going out for the past week or so. I think we fixed the problem.
Thank you to the reader who alerted me!
We here at IP/DE are all practicing attorneys. We try to keep up with around one post per day, but sometimes we have to hang up the gone fishin' sign.
This is one of those times. We have a two-week-long patent trial starting next week, two simultaneous one-week trials shortly thereafter, and we're also spinning up on pretrial disclosures for yet another after that. It's funny how they seem to come all at once.
In short, it's time to call it for now. Assuming we survive—see you soon!
IP/DE launched 3 years ago today, with our first post published on May 25, 2020. The site started off as my pandemic project. I'm thrilled that it's still going three years later—and we don't plan to stop posting any time soon.
As I said in that first post, my goal has always been for IP/DE to be a "less formal, just-what-you-need-to-know style of blog"—the kind of legal blog I'd want to read! Something that "covers only the most interesting parts of opinions, orders, transcripts, and news, in the shortest way I can."
We've continued to strive to hit that goal, although our posts are often longer than I'd like, and we sometimes tend to write about …
Last week, I began receiving reports that the blog was sometimes inaccessible over the network at the District of Delaware courthouse—not a great look for a blog about IP litigation in Delaware with readers who regularly practice there.
I believe we've resolved the issue, but please let me know if it comes back!
Last month, we took a look at how the different judges handle indefiniteness at Markman, a question that comes up a lot.
We reported that every judge will hear argument about indefiniteness issues at Markman. But in the Judge Connolly specific section, we noted that he has never held a term indefinite in a Markman opinion, and has instead deferred ruling on the issue until summary judgment (citing two examples). See the full post for details.
Yesterday, at a hearing, Judge Connolly mentioned a blog post and stated that the post was incorrect in suggesting that he considers indefiniteness at Markman. He clarified that he does not permit indefiniteness argument at Markman. Instead, he might entertain early …
A simple topic for my first post—why start a blog?
Yes, there are already other blogs that cover IP litigation in the District of Delaware, such as YCST's Delaware IP Law Blog—which I used to write for—and Gregory B. Williams' Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation blog.
They've done a great job over the past 10+ years of covering hundreds and hundreds of decisions issued by the judges here. They often post detailed summaries of judicial decisions, and they have covered many seismic changes in the district.
Yes, and I've written for it. It's great. There is also Docket Navigator, which is an …